[lang_en]Optimism[/lang_en][lang_fr]Optimisme[/lang_fr]
[lang_en]
Climate-change and global-warming are among the main themes for this blog, and that is one subject certain to encourage the pessimism in a person. On the face of it, if you accept the scientific evidence for global warming and the rate at which climate-change is happening, it can seem hopeless to attempt do anything about it. Individual actions are just so small on the scale of the problem we all face, and actions of nations on the other side of the world can make everything you do seem irrelevant. Coral reefs are sufferring, the Arctic ice is disappearing fast, extreme weather events are on the increase, and major governments are waiting for someone else to take the first step. The world’s climate has already been changed by mankind, and further change is inevitable, no matter what we do next. Why bother to try to recycle, to save petrol or polar bears, or do anything at all when faced with such a challenge?
Despite this, I personally am optimistic about the future. It’s true that we face a challenge of immense proportions, but individual actions really can make a difference. We talk about “saving the planet”, but the planet is not in peril. It is us, our children, and the plants and animals we share this planet with which need saving. Solving the problem of climate-change means nothing if it is not about saving those lives, those species. The problems of climate-change and conservation of wildlife are closely related. Action is needed by governments, yes, but also by individuals. Governments won’t be able to solve this problem if we don’t want them to. Every level of society needs to be involved, from the UN down to you and me. We don’t need someone else to go first before we act, we can all start now and do something in our own corner. The more people act, the sooner they act, the more difference it makes.
Here are some of the things that happened last year that give me cause to be optimistic.
In Britain, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds ran a campaign in 2008 asking people to do something in their gardens to help birds and the insects they depend upon. Some 25,000 homes responded, with all sorts of contributions. Even something as simple as choosing the right plants for your balcony can make a difference to your local birds by encouraging the right sorts of insects at difficult times.
In September last year, the European Parliament published the results of a survey of 30,000 people around europe to find out their attitudes to climate-change. It seems that 3 people out of every 5 have already taken some personal measure to reduce their carbon footprint. So the majority of europeans have already done something on their own, without waiting for their governments!
Interestingly, 1 person in 10 said that they did not know what they could do to reduce their carbon footprint. Simply talking to people and spreading information is therefore an important thing to do.
Another survey, this time by the BBC, asked 22,000 people worldwide what they know and think about the problems of climate-change. 9 out of every 10 people asked think something should be done, with 2 out of every 3 saying that drastic action is needed in the near future. Even the majority of the Chinese people (7 out of every 10) think that serious action is needed soon. The same picture emerged in almost all the nations included in the survey. Clearly, people accept the need to act when they are well informed.
On a different scale, the European Parliament recently introduced tougher controls on pesticides, such as banning arial spraying, protecting water-resources with buffer-zones, requiring the use of safer alternatives where they are available, and reducing pesticide use in parks, playgrounds, and other public areas.
Perhaps the most optimistic event of 2008 in this respect has to come from the United States. President-elect Obama has chosen real scientists to take key posts in his administration, including a Nobel laureate. Maybe now more governments will stop looking at each other and start looking at themselves.
None of these things is going to “save the planet” on their own, but each of them together may mean that there will be more of the planet left tomorrow, and the day after. Simply knowing that people do care to act once they know the truth is, to me, very encouraging. It’s a beautiful world, and it always will be. Just how beautiful is up to us.
I wish you a happy and peaceful new year.
[/lang_en]
[lang_fr]
Le changement du climat et la rechauffement de la terre sont les themes majeur pour ce blog, et ce sujet est certain d’encourager le pessimism. Si on accept l’evidence scientifique pour la rechauffement de la terre et la vitesse du changement du climat, ca peut paraitre inutile d’essayer d’en faire quelque-chose. Les actes individuels sont si petits face a l’echelle du probleme, et ce qui est fait par des nations sur l’autre cote de la terre peut rendre nul nos efforts. Les recifs coralien souffrent, le glace Arctic dispariat de plus en plus vite, les evenements meteorologique extreme augment, et des gouvernments attendent entre-eux pour prendre le premier pas. Le climat mondial a deja ete change par l’humanite, et d’avantage de changement est ineviable, peut import ce que nous faisons ensuite. Pourquoi essayer de recycler, d’epargner de l’essence, de sauver l’ours polaire, ou de faire n’importe quoi face a un probleme si grand?
Neanmoins, je suis optimiste. C’est vrai que le probleme est immense, mais des actes individuels peuvent faire un difference reel. On parle de «sauver la planete», mais ce n’est pas la planete que est en danger. C’est nous-memes, nos enfants, et tous les plantes et animaux qui partage la planete avec nous qui ont besoin d’etre sauve. Resoudre le probleme du changement du climat ne vaut rien si en ne sauve pas ces vies, ces especes. Les problemes de changement climatique et conservation de la vie sauvage sont lies. Il faut que des gouvernements bouges, si, mais aussi qu’on fasse quelque-chose nous-memes, personnelment. Les gouvernements n’y peuvent rien si nous en voulons pas. Chaque niveau de societe, des Nations-Unis jusqu’a vous et moi, doivent participe. Pas besoin d’attendre que quelqu’un d’autre passe en premiere, on peut tous commencer maintenant dans nos propres coins. Plus on y bouge, plus tot qu’on agisse, plus grande sera l’effet.
Voici quelques evenements de 2008 qui me donnent raison d’etre optimiste.
En grande-bretagne, le Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (societe royale pour le protection des oiseax) a fait une campagne en 2008 demandant aux gens de faire quelque-chose dans leur jardins pour aider les oiseaux et les insectes dont ils depend. l y avait 25.000 repondents, avec des contributions de toutes sortes. Meme des choses simple comme faisant le bon choix des plantes pour le balcon peut encourager les insectes importantes aux periodes difficiles.
En Septembre l’annee derniere, le Parlement European a publie les resultats d’un sondage de 30.000 personnes autour d’europe pour connaitre leurs attitude envers le changement climatique. Il parait que 3 personnnes sur 5 one deja pris des mesures personnels pour reduire leur empreint carbone. Donc, la majorite d’europeans ont deja fait quelque-chose, sans attendre leur gouvernments!
Chose interresant, 1 personne sur 10 a dit qu’ils ne savait pas quoi faire pour reduire leur empreinte carbone. Parler aux gens pour repandre l’information et quelque-chose de tres importante.
Un autre sondage, par le BBC, de 22.000 personnes autour du monde, avait pour but de trouver que savent, que pensent les gens du changement climatique. 9 sur 10 pensent qu’il est necessaire de faire quelque-chose, et 2 sur 3 pensent qu’il faut agir de maniere urgent dans le futur prochain. Meme les chinois (7 sur 10) pensent ca. C’est pareil dans presque tous les nations inclus dans ce sondage, les gens accept qu’il faut agir des qu’ils sont bien renseigne.
A l’echelle plus grand, le Parlement European a dernierement introduit des regles plus severes sur les pesticides, comme l’interdiction de pulverisation par avion, protection des ressources d’eau par des zones de securite, l’obligation d’utiliser des produits moins nocif quand ils sont disponibles, est de reduire l’utilisation dans des parcs, des cour de recreation, et d’autres lieus publiques.
Peut-etre l’evenement le plus important de 2008 dans ce domain est venu des Etats-Unis. Le President-elu Obama a choisi des vrai chercheurs pour des posts cles dans son administration, y compris un gagnant d’un prix Nobel scientifique. Peut-etre que maintenant des gouvernements vont arreter de regarder entre-eux, et vont se regarder eux-memes.
Rien de tout ca va «sauver la planete» toute seule, mais chaque etap ensemble peut vouloir dire qu’il y aura d’avantage de la planete demain, et le jour d’apres. Le simple fait de savoir que les gens veulent agir des qu’ils on compris la verite est, pour moi, tres encourageant. Le monde est beau, est il sera toujours beau. Jusqu’a quel point est pour chaqun de nous de decider.
Je vous souhaite une bonne annee.
[/lang_fr]
Tags: Pesticide, [lang_en]Arctic[/lang_en][lang_fr]l'Arctic[/lang_fr], [lang_en]Birds[/lang_en][lang_fr]Oiseaux[/lang_fr], [lang_en]Climate change[/lang_en][lang_fr]Changement du climat[/lang_fr], [lang_en]Coral[/lang_en][lang_fr]Corail[/lang_fr], [lang_en]European Parliament[/lang_en][lang_fr]Parlement Europeen[/lang_fr], [lang_en]RSPB[/lang_en][lang_fr]RSPB (protection des oiseaux)[/lang_fr]











January 6th, 2009 at 11:26
I think that’s the most important thing to get into poeples minds, it’s not about us, it’s about the future of our children, grand children and so on. We might not be able to see the changes that we contribute to but the future generations will see it.
I wish you a great new year!
January 6th, 2009 at 14:30
Hi Sanna,
and a happy new year to you too!
I agree it’s important to get people to realise that they are effectively stealing from their children if they don’t act now, but it’s also important that they take global-warming personally, that they realise that they too have direct benefits to gain if they act on their own, regardless of how others act. Increasing your personal energy-efficiency saves money, reducing chemical-use is better for the environment and for yourself, and so on.
There’s a very good video on the web by Dan Gilbert about why people don’t respond to the threat of global warming, in which he covers the topic quite thoroughly. I realise not everyone has time to look at videos like that, so I’ll be reviewing it in a post sometime soon.
I guess the bottom line is that some people may act to save the polar bear, some may act to save their children, some may act to save money, and some for other reasons. It doesn’t really matter which motive a given person responds to since the action (and the results) is the same.